Schools - Ranking of Junior Colleges 2000

     Ranking of Junior Colleges 2000

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR JUNIOR COLLEGES 2000

As in previous years, the Ministry of Education is providing information on the performance of Junior Colleges (JCs) to help students and their parents make informed choices when selecting JCs.

  1. Table 1gives an overall picture of how each college performed in a number of selected academic performance indicators and the intake quality of its students.

  2. Table 2shows the students' physical fitness and percentage of overweight students in each JC.

  3. In Table 3, the colleges are ranked according to the different indicators, including value-added performance and fitness index. It shows that different colleges can excel in different areas.

  4. Table 4shows the L1R5 aggregate scores of students admitted to the different JCs in 2000.

  5. For the 1999 GCE A-level examination, Temasek JC was the top JC for the value-added performance while Raffles JC came in second. The value-added performance of a JC is calculated by comparing its students' A-level performance against the expected performance based on their O-level results when they entered the JC. The Ministry will award $20,000 to Temasek JC and $10,000 to Rafffles JC for their value-added performance. Yishun JC, Jurong JC and Victoria JC were the top JCs in Fitness Index.

  6. Data on the performance of each JC will be included in the Information Booklet which students will receive when applying for admission into JCs.

    Table 1: Performance of Junior Colleges
    (Based on 1999 GCE A-Level Results)

     

    S/No

    Junior College

    No. of Pupils

    Mean L1R5

    1999 GCE A-Level Results

    Mean A-Level Points

    Mean Subject Grade

    % Grade A or B

    % Passed 3 A-Levels or More

    % Passed GP

    1

    Anderson

    815

    10.5

    63

    2.2

    66

    96

    91

    2

    Anglo-Chinese

    803

    11.6

    60

    2.3

    60

    95

    95

    3

    Catholic

    743

    14.7

    53

    3.1

    35

    88

    78

    4

    Hwa Chong

    889

    7.4

    70

    1.5

    87

    100

    97

    5

    Jurong

    768

    14.1

    56

    2.7

    46

    92

    76

    6

    Nanyang

    810

    13.2

    56

    2.8

    44

    88

    89

    7

    National

    801

    8.8

    66

    1.8

    79

    99

    97

    8

    Raffles

    861

    7.3

    70

    1.5

    89

    99

    99

    9

    Serangoon

    691

    16.3

    50

    3.4

    29

    78

    74

    10

    St. Andrew's

    807

    12.5

    59

    2.4

    58

    97

    84

    11

    Tampines

    831

    13.0

    57

    2.7

    48

    92

    88

    12

    Temasek

    851

    9.3

    67

    1.7

    81

    99

    97

    13

    Victoria

    788

    8.8

    67

    1.7

    83

    99

    95

    14

    Yishun

    677

    16.7

    50

    3.4

    30

    73

    78

    Table 2: Fitness Data For Junior Colleges in 1999

    S/No

    Junior College

    Fitness Index#

    Percentage Overweight*

    % Passed NAPFA@ Test

    1

    Anderson

    86.7

    5.8

    80.6

    2

    Anglo-Chinese

    86.8

    5.0

    80.1

    3

    Catholic

    78.0

    7.9

    65.5

    4

    Hwa Chong

    89.2

    4.6

    85.3

    5

    Jurong

    92.0

    4.6

    91.3

    6

    Nanyang

    82.6

    6.6

    73.7

    7

    National

    89.1

    3.0

    83.3

    8

    Raffles

    89.1

    5.0

    84.0

    9

    Serangoon

    83.5

    6.7

    75.7

    10

    St. Andrew's

    81.3

    7.9

    74.4

    11

    Tampines

    82.1

    8.1

    76.5

    12

    Temasek

    88.8

    4.8

    84.7

    13

    Victoria

    90.2

    3.7

    86.9

    14

    Yishun

    92.7

    4.7

    90.2

     

    #

    The Fitness Index (FI) is defined as the average of: (i) the percentage of pupils within the acceptable weight range and; (ii) the percentage of pupils who pass the NAPFA test. 

    * 

    Refers to percentage of pupils who are overweight by 20% or more according to standards provided by the Ministry of Health.

    @ 

    National Physical Fitness Award.

    The acceptable weight range is from 80% to below 120% of standard weight.

     

    Table 3: Ranking of Junior Colleges by Performance Indicator
    (Based on 1999 GCE A-Level Results and Fitness Index)

    S/No

    Junior College

    Ranking of JC1 Intake in 1998

    Ranking by Performance Indicator

    Ranking on Fitness Index*

    Mean A- Level Points

    Mean Subject Grade

    % Grades A or B

    % Passed 3 A- Levels or More

    % Passed GP

    Value- Added Indicator

    1

    Anderson

    6

    6

    6

    6

    7

    7

    7

    9

    2

    Anglo-Chinese

    7

    7

    7

    7

    8

    5

    9

    8

    3

    Catholic

    12

    12

    12

    12

    11

    11

    13

    14

    4

    Hwa Chong

    2

    1

    1

    2

    1

    2

    4

    4

    5

    Jurong

    11

    10

    9

    10

    9

    13

    8

    2

    6

    Nanyang

    10

    10

    11

    11

    11

    8

    11

    11

    7

    National

    3

    5

    5

    5

    2

    2

    5

    5

    8

    Raffles

    1

    1

    1

    1

    2

    1

    2

    5

    9

    Serangoon

    13

    13

    13

    14

    13

    14

    14

    10

    10

    St. Andrew's

    8

    8

    8

    8

    6

    10

    6

    13

    11

    Tampines

    9

    9

    9

    9

    9

    9

    10

    12

    12

    Temasek

    5

    3

    3

    4

    2

    2

    1

    7

    13

    Victoria

    3

    3

    3

    3

    2

    5

    3

    3

    14

    Yishun

    14

    13

    13

    13

    14

    11

    12

    1

     

    *

    Based on all students, including those in JC1.

     

     

    Table 4: Aggregate L1R5 Scores of Students Admitted in 2000

     

    S/No

    Junior College

    Arts

    Science

    Mean

    Range

    Mean

    Range

    1

    Anderson

    11.8

    6 - 15

    9.9

    6 - 13

    2

    Anglo-Chinese

    12.6

    6 - 16

    11.0

    6 - 15

    3

    Catholic

    16.3

    9 - 20

    15.0

    8 - 20

    4

    Hwa Chong

    7.8

    6 - 11

    6.7

    6 - 9

    5

    Jurong

    15.7

    8 - 20

    14.1

    7 - 19

    6

    Nanyang

    14.1

    8 - 18

    11.9

    7 - 15

    7

    National

    9.5

    6 - 12

    8.4

    6 - 11

    8

    Pioneer

    17.5

    9 - 20

    15.7

    8 - 20

    9

    Raffles

    8.6

    6 - 13

    6.5

    6 - 8

    10

    Serangoon

    16.1

    10 - 20

    16.0

    9 - 20

    11

    St. Andrew's

    12.4

    7 - 16

    11.0

    6 - 14

    12

    Tampines

    13.4

    7 - 17

    11.8

    7 - 15

    13

    Temasek

    10.2

    7 - 13

    8.8

    6 - 12

    14

    Victoria

    9.2

    6 - 12

    7.9

    6 - 11

    15

    Yishun

    17.8

    13 - 20

    16.2

    8 - 20

     

    Notes:

    1.         The above L1R5 aggregate is based on all students who applied to the JCs through the Joint Admission Exercise and before taking into account bonus points.

    2.         Students are given 2 bonus points if they have a pass in Higher Mother Tongue Language, and another 2 points if their Secondary Schools are affiliated to the JCs that they are applying for, or they have been provisionally admitted to the JC. Students are also given 1 to 2 bonus points based on their ECA performance. Normally, the maximum bonus points allowable are 4 points. However, students applying to Hwa Chong JC, Nanyang JC and Temasek JC for their Chinese LEP program can enjoy additional 2 bonus points. These students are therefore allowed up to a maximum of 6 bonus points.

    3.         Further details can be found in the guide to the Joint Admission Exercise.

APPENDIX

Explanatory Notes for Tables on Ranking of Junior Colleges

1          The following four tables provide information on the performance of junior colleges in the 1999 GCE A-level examination, data on physical fitness of their students, and aggregate scores of those admitted in 2000.