SPEECH BY MR LEE HSIEN LOONG,PRIME
MINISTER, AT 2007 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE DINNER, 22 MARCH 2007, 8.00
PM AT MERITUS MANDARIN SINGAPORE
Mr Peter Ho, Head of the Civil
Service
Distinguished guests,
Ladies and gentlemen
INTRODUCTION
1. First, let me congratulate those officers who have been promoted,
and those who have been confirmed or absorbed into the
Administrative Service. I also congratulate all the officers who
have been appointed to the Management Associates Programme.
Mr Lim Siong Guan
2. This is a fitting occasion to acknowledge the sterling
contributions of two Permanent Secretaries who retired from the
Administrative Service in October last year. Mr Lim Siong Guan has
served for 38 years in the public sector. He was Permanent
Secretary in several key ministries, including Defence, the Prime
Minister*s Office, Education and Finance. Siong Guan transformed
each ministry that he helmed. He put in place systems to groom
talent and personally mentored generations of young officers. He
went into the heart of the ministries* policy issues and led them
into new strategic directions. As Head of Civil Service, he pushed
agencies to become more pro-enterprise, and to take a
whole-of-government approach. He was a firm believer in leadership
renewal, and asked to step down himself, so that a system of fixed
term appointments could be established. Siong Guan is continuing
his service as Chairman of the EDB. He is bringing to EDB his
passion, unwavering dedication and drive for excellence, bringing
out the best from his people, and delivering jobs and employment
opportunities for Singaporeans.
Mr Kishore Mahbubani
3. Mr Kishore Mabhubani also retired last October, after 35 years of
service. As an Administrative Officer (AO) in the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, Kishore served in Cambodia, Malaysia, Washington DC
and New York, and later as Permanent Secretary (Foreign Affairs).
As Ambassador to the United Nations, he was instrumental in getting
Singapore elected to the UN Security Council, and in overseeing
Singapore*s term on the Council. Kishore*s many contributions on the
international front have raised the global profile of Singapore and
our diplomatic service. In 2004, Kishore was appointed Dean of the
Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. I am glad that Kishore is
continuing to serve Singapore in that capacity, after his
retirement.
KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
4. I last attended the Administrative Service Dinner two years ago.
The mood then was positive. We had pulled through several difficult
years, and the economy was starting to improve. Since then, the
momentum has accelerated. We have enjoyed three consecutive years
of solid growth and job creation. Looking ahead, our prospects have
never been better.
5. One key reason is globalisation. Singapore is plugged into the
global grid, linked to all the major economies, and drawing capital,
enterprise and talent from all over the world. We are well-placed
at the heart of a rising Asia. China and India are powering ahead,
and Japan*s economy has revived after a decade of deflation.
Southeast Asia is not without problems, but this wider Asian tide is
carrying along our neighbours too, and Singapore is benefiting from
that.
6. Globalisation is working in our favour because we are doing the
right things in Singapore. The Government has pursued sound
policies to create an environment that is secure, competitive and
pro-growth. We have kept Singapore safe in a turbulent and
uncertain world. We have upgraded the economy, streamlined
regulations to foster enterprise, and promoted flourishing new
industries. We have given every child access to a first-class
education, taken care of the lower-income and elderly, and provided
opportunities for all to strive and succeed.
7. The private sector has taken advantage of the stable and
business-friendly conditions to create wealth and generate
prosperity. Individual Singaporeans have responded to the
Government*s lead and played their part. Working together, we are
transforming ourselves, and outperforming bigger and better endowed
competitors.
8. As a result, Singapore has established a good brand name, and
enhanced its reputation for sound government and an excellent public
service. International agencies consistently rate us highly. The
recent PERC Comparative Country Risk Report ranked Singapore the
least risky country in Asia. We did well across all indicators, but
especially in the measures of governance, such as the quality of the
civil service, the effectiveness of government policies, and the
lack of corruption.
9. Singaporeans may not read PERC reports, but they know that here
we have good schools for our children, good public hospitals for our
patients, good jobs for our workers, good HDB flats for our
families, a good airport and seaport for our visitors and
businesses, and a good and secure supply of water and NEWater from
our four national taps. Singaporeans also know that when we run into
problems, be it SARS or dengue fever or terrorism, they can feel
protected and safe because somehow, the ministers and civil servants
will figure a way out, and work day and night to keep the situation
in Singapore under control.
10. The quality of our Public Service is one of our most sustainable
advantages, just like our practice of tripartism. Other countries
send study teams to learn how we do it. We are happy to share our
experience with them, but they cannot easily replicate what we have
done. This is something which we have built up over the years, and
which we must zealously uphold and improve upon.
IMPERATIVES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE
11. Globalisation and our more advanced economy put even greater
demands on high-quality governance. Paradoxically, our very success
makes our task harder.
12. In a rapidly changing world, efficiency, flexibility and speed
are at a premium. Governments need to be small and lean, but good
governance is more essential than ever, especially for a tiny
country like Singapore. We are no longer competing in a small pond;
like it or not, we are swimming in the wide blue ocean. Our economy
works on free market principles, and our society prizes
self-reliance; but for both to thrive, we need an active, inspired
and capable government.
13. The Government cannot just follow time-honoured rules and
administer existing systems. It must question old assumptions,
review long-standing policies, and come up not only with new ideas
but also new ambitions. For example, we need creative schemes for
continuing education and lifelong learning, which will equip all
Singaporeans to take on better and higher-paying jobs. As our
population and our economy grow, we need innovative urban planning
concepts to integrate our green spaces and waterways, and make
Singapore truly the best place to live, work and play. In our
social planning, we need to anticipate and pre-empt the problems of
being one of the fastest greying populations in the world, and
design schemes and incentives which will uplift the lower-income
while strengthening the spirit of self-reliance and the will to
achieve. In international relations, we need a clear appreciation
of the changing strategic landscape, and agile responses to emerging
trends, so that the major powers will find it in their interest that
Singapore survives, and our neighbours will want to cooperate with
us for mutual benefit.
14. The key in all this is for the Government to take a strategic
view, look over the horizon, and create the conditions and
opportunities for Singapore to grow over the long-term. This is as
entrepreneurial and demanding a mission as running any business.
The difference lies in what is at stake: not the financial
investments of shareholders, but the lives and future of citizens.
The business is about Singapore, and it cannot fail.
15. Up to now, Singapore has had the benefit of following and
adapting best practices by others who are ahead of us. But as we
move closer to the leading edge, we will have to break new ground
ourselves, find fresh solutions, and feel our own way forward. In
January I met the International Academic Advisory Panel (IAAP),
which advises us on tertiary education. I asked them which
countries we could learn from. They told me that there are no ready
models to study, because in some respects Singapore is already at
the frontier. The Panel meant it as a compliment, but I also took
it as a caution. For it means that increasingly we will have to
experiment, make our own mistakes, learn from them and improve
ourselves.
GLOBALISATION OF TALENT
16. To do all this well, we need first-class minds in first-class
organisations 每 working on complex and often inter-connected
problems, generating ideas and solutions, managing the risks, and
delivering the results. Building up a team of such calibre in the
Public Service is difficult but crucial.
17. Globalisation has created a single worldwide market for talent.
Able people are in demand everywhere, and are also highly mobile.
Singapore has attracted professionals from all over the world. They
come to work not just in MNCs, but increasingly in Singapore
companies that aim for international standards, and operate regional
and global businesses. Some of this foreign talent work in
government agencies, making significant contributions. This is not
just happening here. In Wall Street and the City of London, top
research firms and financial institutions rely on a cosmopolitan mix
of talent, including not a few Singaporeans.
18. For young Singaporeans today, the world is their oyster.
Choices are wide open at an early age, whether for studies or for
work. An overseas education or career is a viable option for many,
not just a few at the top. When I graduated from school in 1969,
about a dozen students in my class took up Government or Colombo
Plan scholarships to study abroad. Without the scholarships, most
would not have been able to go to university, must less study
abroad.
19. Today, the situation is totally different. Scholarships are
chasing students, not the other way round. The Straits Times
publishes a thick guide every year to all the available scholarships
from different organisations. Many good students decline
scholarship offers, because their families have the means to fund
their education. Top universities in the US and Britain are
competing against each other to attract the best students, and offer
full fee scholarships with no strings attached. Singapore students
have established high reputations with these universities. If they
are good, the doors are wide open. Last year, one young woman
offered an OMS scholarship told the PSC: ※No, thank you. I am going
to Princeton. They will pay for my education and there is no bond§.
20. This scramble for talent is a global phenomenon. At US
universities, top students are being offered jobs before they
graduate by companies like McKinsey or Goldman Sachs. These
companies take promising students for internships, and then make job
offers to the best ones, complete with sign-on bonuses. PSC
scholars are often the target of these recruitment drives.
Fortunately, they know their responsibilities and have come back to
Singapore.
21. One positive side of globalisation is that we are developing a
strong overseas network of Singaporeans. Our people are not just in
the leading cities of the world but also in less familiar
destinations. I recently met vibrant little Singaporean communities
in Chengdu (China) and Doha (Qatar). These are not 谷migr谷s, but
Singaporeans working and living abroad, pursuing their careers or
their own ventures. They often start young, and sometimes stay
abroad for long periods.
22. We are happy that Singaporeans enjoy these global opportunities,
and that more of them are venturing abroad. But at the same time,
we worry for Singapore, because it will be harder than ever to keep
our best people here. How will Singapore businesses recruit talent
and grow into first-class companies? How will we create the jobs
and opportunities for the less successful Singaporeans, who cannot
seek their fortunes in China, India or the US? How will the Public
Service maintain a first-class team that can lead Singapore into the
future? The reality is that the Public Service is competing not
just against Singapore companies or MNCs based here, but against the
top global companies, and opportunities around the world. The
Public Service will therefore have to do more to attract its share
of talent, and maintain a strong, high-calibre team.
A PUBLIC SERVICE FOR THE FUTURE
23. How can we do this? It is a chicken-and-egg problem. Good
people want to work in good organisations. But without a good team,
it is not possible to build a good organisation. The way out of
this conundrum is to focus on excellent public sector leadership.
We need leaders who will anticipate problems, work across
organisational boundaries, devise creative solutions, and implement
policies that best serve Singapore. We need leaders who will give
their teams the confidence to operate in conditions of change and
uncertainty, and to find opportunity in every challenge. Leaders
who will groom and nurture their officers, engage their energies,
and attract more able people to join. Then the Public Service as a
whole can deliver first-class governance for Singapore.
24. The Administrative Service is at the core of the Public Service,
and plays a central role in bringing this about. It must work
closely with all the other services to coordinate
whole-of-government action, and ensure an effective Public Service
for the future. We need to do several things to achieve this common
goal.
25. First, we must make the Public Service a first-class outfit with
谷lan and spirit. The Public Service ranks highly in international
comparisons against other civil services, but we should also compare
ourselves to the top companies in the world. Look at Google 每 an
exciting and innovative organisation, with a distinctive and
appealing culture. Rated by Fortune magazine as the best company to
work for, Google receives 1,300 resumes a day! The Public Service
must strive to have that same cachet. The whole tone of the
organisation must exude confidence, energy and purpose. We must
generate a sense of excitement and mission among our officers. Then
more young people will consider the Public Service seriously as a
career option 每 a place where they can change Singapore for the
better, a place where they want to be.
26. Second, the Public Service must offer challenging and fulfilling
careers. Young people joining the service must be given
opportunities to learn new skills and assigned responsibilities that
challenge and stretch them. If the work environment and culture is
stodgy and uninspired, they will be turned off and good people will
leave.
27. The contributions of public officers are not always visible to
the public eye. But behind every new policy, every major ministerial
statement, there is always a team of dedicated officers who do the
staff work, work out the scheme, iron out the details, and see
through the implementation. A prime example is the radical policy
changes in the recent Budget. The Budget Speech was the culmination
of months of combined effort by a whole team in MOF and also in MOM,
because of Workfare and the CPF changes. The team comprised many
young officers, some in their first posting, working alongside
experienced ones. (Somewhere in MOM there is an Excel wizard,
without whose spreadsheets we could not have designed the Workfare
scheme.) Together, they helped to settle major changes to our
social safety nets and fiscal structure.
28. Third, we have to prepare our officers for the new challenges of
a globalised and fast-changing world. They need to acquire a better
sense of the competitive environment that they are operating in.
They also need to develop the instincts of the entrepreneur 每 the
quick reaction to seize fleeting opportunities and the boldness to
try out new ideas.
29. The Administrative Service has introduced a GAP year, which
allows Management Associates to work for a spell in an organisation
of their choice after graduation. Taking advantage of this,
officers have worked in banks, consultancy firms, and MNCs in China,
India, UK and the US. They have gained firsthand experience of what
makes these private enterprises tick, what their concerns are, and
what their corporate ethos is like. This has benefited not only the
officers but also the Service. As these officers rise in the
Service, their experiences will help them to evolve the culture of
the Service for the better.
30. We will do more going forward. As Head Civil Service has said,
the Administrative Service will be deploying more AOs out of the
ministry HQs to companies, operational agencies, think-tanks, and
also to postings abroad. This will enrich the work experiences of
our AOs, and broaden their exposure to new ideas and other corporate
cultures. Best practices today are as likely to be found in the
private sector as they are in the public sector.
31. Fourth, we have to reward public officers according to their
contributions and potential. We must hold officers accountable for
their performance, and advance deserving officers in their careers.
That has been our policy for quite some time. We have abandoned the
practice of the iron rice bowl 每 of paying indifferently and being
satisfied with unexceptional performance. We have to recognise
people according to their jobs, their responsibilities, and their
contributions. And as the task of governing Singapore grows, and
their responsibilities increase, we must revise our assessments and
promotions to keep up.
32. Hence, as Head Civil Service has said, we are reviewing job
grades in the Administrative Service. This is both to be fair to
the officers themselves, and also to signal to the entire Service
that if you do well, your efforts will be rewarded. (If you do not
do well, you will also be noticed.) Only then will young officers
starting out on their careers aspire towards public sector
leadership positions. Only then will they be motivated to work hard
and excel, and commit themselves to the Service as a worthwhile
long-term career path.
COMPETITIVE SALARIES
33. For the Public Service to remain an attractive employer, our
terms must keep pace with the private sector. That is why our
policy is to pay public servants competitive salaries, commensurate
with private sector earnings.
34. Salaries in the private sector have been moving. Many good and
well-paying jobs have been created, especially in the last two
years. A recent world-wide survey conducted by the employment
agency Manpower Inc. showed that Singapore employers are the most
bullish among 27 countries about the employment outlook. Specific
industries are doing very well, such as finance, where there is
strong growth in wealth management and private banking. Other
sectors are also on the move, with increasing demand for lawyers and
IT professionals.
35. The demand for Singaporeans is not just coming from our own
economy. Because of the Singapore brand name, our people are being
talent-hunted to work all over Asia. Many CFOs in China are
Singaporeans, because of our reputation for competence and
integrity. We know from head-hunters that the entire top
managements of some of our agencies are being targeted. The Middle
Eastern countries are particularly interested. They have studied
Singapore*s success story. They want to tap our people to join them
and replicate the miracle, and money is no object. Even foreign
workers who have worked in Singapore shipyards here are in demand in
the Gulf. We even received a feeler from one Middle Eastern country
to buy the whole of JTC!
36. All this will have an impact on the Public Service. In terms of
salaries, generally we have tried to keep pace with the market, but
the situation is uneven across the services. Some services have
built-in market adjustment mechanisms that have kept them in line.
Others like the Education Service have recently made adjustments.
However, some services have fallen significantly behind the private
sector. They may need not just salary revisions, but also
restructuring of their schemes of services, such as the Management
Executive Scheme for graduates.
37. The Administrative Service is one of those that have fallen
behind. Administrative Service salaries were last adjusted in 2000
每 seven years ago. There are two private sector salary benchmarks
for the Administrative Service. One is set at SR9. This is the
lowest Superscale grade, at which officers in their early to mid 30s
enter the senior ranks of the Administrative Service. This
benchmark dipped from 2001 to 2004, but has since climbed again. It
now stands at $361,000, about the same as what it was in 2000
($363,000). Actual SR9 salaries were cut more sharply than the
benchmark between 2001 and 2004, and have since been restored.
Current salaries are in line with the benchmark.
38. The second benchmark for the Administrative Service is set at
Staff Grade I. The most senior Permanent Secretaries can be
appointed to the Staff Grades. The benchmark is defined as
two-thirds of the median income of the eight top-earning
professionals in each of six professions 每 bankers, lawyers,
accountants, MNC executives, local manufacturer executives and
engineers. Present Staff Grade I salaries are at the same level as
the benchmark in 2000, when it was $1.21 million. But now the
benchmark is $2.20 million.
39. These latest benchmark figures are based on income tax returns
in the Year of Assessment 2006, which means incomes actually earned
in 2005. In the two years since then, private sector incomes have
most probably risen further.
40. This is an urgent problem. We have experienced on previous
occasions the painful consequences of responding too slowly when the
private sector surged ahead. For example in the early 1990s, the
Administrative Service lost entire cohorts of good officers. This
showed up in the age profile of the Service 每 broad at the young and
older age groups, but narrow at the mid- to late-30s range. We took
many years to recover from the loss. This must not happen again.
41. The SR9 grade is crucial as it is a key milestone which able AOs
in their early 30s look towards. Although we appear to be alright
at this level, in fact I believe we will soon come under pressure.
We know that the market for young professionals is moving,
particularly in the financial sector, and this will eventually show
up in the benchmark. We must keep the SR9 salary market competitive
to retain able officers at a critical decision point in their
careers. For Staff Grade I, the present salary is at 55% of the
benchmark, and we have to close this gap.
42. This is why the Government is currently reviewing Civil Service
remuneration schemes. The review will cover the Administrative
Service as well as other services that are lagging behind the
private sector, because every service is important, and each must be
able to attract and retain good people.
43. Besides Civil Service salaries, we are also reviewing salaries
for the political, judicial and statutory appointment holders. It
is even more critical for us to keep these salaries competitive, so
as to be able to bring in a continuing flow of able and successful
people to be ministers and judges. Unless there is a first-class
political leadership and judiciary, the Civil Service, however
capable and dedicated, will not be able to function properly.
44. Minister Teo Chee Hean will announce the salary changes in a
Ministerial Statement in Parliament on 9th April.
CONCLUSION
45. We have built an outstanding Public Service in Singapore, which
has served the nation well. We pay competitive wages, attract and
retain people of calibre, and hold them to high standards of
integrity and performance.
46. However, financial rewards cannot be the main motivation of
public officers. The Public Service is not about maximising the
profit of the firm. Public servants are trustees, guardians, and
stewards, not just of public funds, but also of Singapore*s future.
We do not expect them to make unreasonable financial sacrifices to
be in the public sector, but they must feel a sense of idealism, of
duty and responsibility, and of a larger purpose. Ultimately, good
public administration is about building the nation and improving the
lives of all Singaporeans.
47. Here in the Administrative Service, what you do affects whether
Singaporeans have better jobs, better housing, a better life. It
affects the future of your family, your friends, and your
countrymen. It is a heavy responsibility, but also an extraordinary
opportunity. If you do your job well, if we all do our jobs well,
we will make Singapore a truly special country, and one that we can
all be proud of.
﹛