|
 |
|
Source:
www.gov.sg |
|
Excerpt of speech by Education
Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam |
|
|
We took greater ownership over our
A-level examinations in 2002, while continuing to tap on the expertise of the
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES). |
|
The introduction of the broader
and more flexible A-level curriculum in Singapore in 2006, will be the next
major change in our curriculum and examinations. It will also involve a
reduced overall curriculum load for JC students. |
|
Greater Control of GCE O-Level
Exam |
|
Just as we took greater ownership
of the A-levels in 2002, the Ministry of Education (MOE) together with the
Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board (SEAB) will assume greater control
over the GCE O-level examination from 2006. |
|
We will take greater
responsibility for developing examination syllabuses and formats, setting
standards, and awarding grades. The move will enable us over time to customise
the curriculum and examinations to our educational needs, while maintaining
the high standards that Singapore is known for. |
|
Unlike the new A-level curriculum
that we will introduce in 2006, however, we do not expect to make major
changes to the structure of our O-levels for the foreseeable future. The
O-level curriculum will be refined in an evolutionary fashion. |
|
Refining JC Project Work
Assessment |
|
Another area that we intend to
refine is the assessment of Project Work (PW) in the Junior College
curriculum. |
|
PW is a sound innovation in our
curriculum. It gives students the opportunity to work in teams, see
interconnections between different disciplines, undertake research using
multiple sources and make credible presentations of their findings. It
develops useful skills, that students will find useful when they go on to
university, and in working life. |
|
Since its implementation as part
of the JC curriculum two years ago, teachers and students have gained an
understanding of the processes and learning outcomes of PW. |
|
However we have identified some
areas in the assessment of PW that need to be modified, so as to ensure that
students find PW engaging and meaningful, and do not just go through the hoops
for the sake of meeting the requirements. For example, students have found the
assessment criteria too detailed, and the documentation requirements too
extensive. |
|
We will make refinements to PW
from next year, which takes into account the feedback we have received. |
|
The number of assessment criteria
will be reduced significantly. Each student will be required to submit no more
than three documents for assessment. The scope of the PW tasks will also be
broadened, to give students greater flexibility and choice in shaping their
projects. |
|
These modifications are part of
the process of continuous review and of learning from the experience of
schools as they implement PW. This feedback loop, from experience on the
ground to the design of curriculum and assessment, is essential for any
successful innovation in education. |
|
Full Text of Speech |
|
Source:
Ministry of Education Press Release 8 Nov
2004 |