|
|
Previous FrontPage Edition 1 May
2005
|
Back to
FrontPage
of Article
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Minister's
May Day Rally Speech 2005 |
|
|
SPEECH
BY MR LEE HSIEN LOONG,PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER FOR FINANCE, AT
MAY DAY RALLY, 1 MAY 2005, 5.30 PM AT NTUC CENTRE, ONE MARINA
BOULEVARD
MAY DAY RALLY BY PRIME MINISTER LEE HSIEN LOONG
ON 1 MAY 2005, 5.30PM, NTUC CENTRE
Introduction
1.
Happy to join you today at this May Day gathering.
2.
We are living through an eventful period. There are two
significant changes taking place.
a.
We have a new leadership team
b.
Our economy is at a turning point. We are restructuring
to adapt to new circumstances, especially driven by the rise of
China and India. What we do in the next few years will profoundly
affect Singapore’s relevance to this new world.
3.
Today I will address the questions
a.
Moving forward, with new leaders and a new generation of
Singaporeans, how will it affect labour relations in Singapore?
b.
How are we going to respond to the challenges that workers
face?
Change in Leadership Will not
Affect Labour Relations
4.
We have maintained good tripartite relations for many years
a.
Workers, employers and Government worked closely together
b.
Shared the fruits of success as our economy grew and
prospered
i.
Wages increase as companies grow and GDP goes up
ii.
Bigger bonuses in good years
iii.
With growth, Government invest our resources back in
workers, in education, training, healthcare, housing, issuing ERS
and NSS etc
c.
At the same time, gone through difficulties together
i.
Sacrificed together to weather storms like Financial Crisis
and SARS
ii.
Adopted a frank and sincere approach to solving national
problems
iii.
Worked together to tackle difficult problems, e.g. CPF
reforms, company restructuring
iv.
Developed trust in one another, so that each time we manage
a crisis successfully, we emerge stronger and our partnership
becomes closer
d.
Ours is a win-win-win relationship
5.
I and my team will not change this approach of maintaining
constructive and harmonious tripartite relationships
a.
Tripartite co-operation is fundamental to our economic
survival and ability to create jobs for Singaporeans
b.
My Ministers understand its importance fully
i.
Especially Secretary General Lim Boon Heng, who is an
experienced and key member of my team. He is also the PAP Party
Chairman
ii.
Mr Lim Swee Say too, with his previous experiences
(1)
In EDB, where he learnt what
investors look for when deciding to put in their money
(2)
In several ministries, learning how
the government works
(3)
In NTUC for many years, helping to
improve the welfare of workers
c.
Also we have MPs serving in the NTUC Central Committee, and
many more Party members serving on the ground as union leaders
6.
My team is therefore committed to work to improve the lives
of Singaporeans
a.
Workers are a big segment of Singaporeans
b.
Hence one of our top priorities will always be the interest
of workers
c.
Unions will remain a key partner of my Government.
i.
Understand the concerns of workers, and work with the
unions to address them
ii.
Involve unions when drawing up plans for the future and
making major decisions affecting workers
iii.
Co-opt the unions to grow our economy and create more jobs
Responding to Challenges
7.
In my May Day Message, I mentioned three long term
challenges
a.
Staying head in a New Asia
b.
Managing an ageing population
c.
Tackling structural unemployment
8.
Today, I will like to outline our strategies to deal with
these challenges
Restructure to Grow the Economy and Create Jobs
9.
China, India, and our Southeast Asian neighbours will
continue to grow and compete with us.
a.
We cannot stand still; we have to restructure, upgrade, and
adapt to the new landscape
10.
This strategy is working
a.
e.g. PSA has successfully restructured and is doing well.
It overtook Hong Kong as number one port in the world in first
quarter of 2005
b.
CAAS and SIA too are making good progress
c.
Many investments coming in for both manufacturing and
services. The IRs will be another big plus for our economy
d.
As a result
i.
Unemployment has fallen below 4%
ii.
Retrenchment in 2004 was 10,000, the lowest since the Asian
Financial Crisis
iii.
Overall, we have net creation of 71,000 jobs in 2004, of
which 70% went to locals
11.
Hence in May Day message I said that overall the outlook is
positive
a.
Straits Times headline: “Don't worry, the outlook is good,
says PM Lee”
b.
But we must always worry!
c.
Better headline would have been: “Outlook good, but be
careful and work hard, says PM Lee”
12.
I know that workers are still worried about job security
a.
They know how strong the competition is
b.
They see that despite growth, there will continue to be
retrenchments – e.g. Maxtor
13.
It is tough to go through retrenchment, and have to
re-skill and get re-employed. But it is unavoidable. To grow our
economy and create more jobs, we have to become leaner, more
efficient and competitive, i.e. we have to allow restructuring to
take place. This means turnover and sometimes retrenchment. If we
try to delay the restructuring in order to protect existing jobs,
the result will be worse.
14.
Big countries often try to protect jobs by shutting out
imports, so that domestic industries will survive and continue to
employ workers. But this does not work even for the big
countries, e.g. textiles in America
a.
For decades the US tried to protect textiles jobs by
setting quotas for imported textiles
b.
American consumers were forced to pay billions of dollars
more for their clothes
c.
But the US textiles industry still shrank, because the cost
difference between American and foreign textiles was too great.
American producers were simply uncompetitive in world markets. And
even in the US, the retailers found ways to get around the quotas
d.
Because the US resisted change, its textiles industry did
not really upgrade and become competitive. Neither did the
government do enough to prepare textiles workers for other jobs.
Now the textile quotas have ended, imports have surged,
particularly from China. The industry cannot cope with the
competition, and is clamouring for protection again
e.
The same story is happening in Europe
15.
Other countries try to shut out foreign workers, to protect
jobs for locals
a.
e.g. Germany is facing an influx of East European workers.
e.g. The brick layers are mostly from Poland. The German
government is now proposing a law to require foreign companies
doing business in Germany to pay their workers full German
salaries
b.
But this will only drive up cost of doing business in
Germany and encourage German companies to invest elsewhere, as
they are doing in Poland, in the Czech Republic, or in Asia
16.
Singapore cannot do this
a.
Our plants produce goods to export to the whole world.
i.
e.g. we produce 90 million disk drives a year, one-third of
the world supply
ii.
We cannot help the disk drive industry by protecting the
local market. How many disk drives does each Singaporean need per
year?
iii.
We also cannot force disk drive makers to hire only
Singaporeans, or make it difficult for them to restructure and
shed workers when they need to. If we did, would they stay and
continue to invest here, or would they just relocate to China or
Vietnam?
17.
A better approach is to allow in a controlled number of
foreign workers,
a.
Hence the levy, as well a cap on the proportion of foreign
workers a company can hire
b.
That way, the foreign workers can complement Singapore
workers to create more jobs for Singaporeans
Helping the Troubled Segments
18.
Restructuring has to continue. It is better for us to
endure some short term pain, so that in the long term, we stay
competitive, and can continue to create more jobs. But we must
pay special attention to workers who have the biggest problem
adjusting. There are three groups
19.
Older workers
a.
More difficult to adapt to changes in economy
b.
More concerned about old age expenses, and medical
expenses, especially given that Singaporeans are living longer
c.
Best solution is for Singaporeans to work longer, and
retire later.
d.
Then they can continue to support their families, and save
more for their old age
e.
But this is no easy to do. We have to tackle the problem
on many fronts
i.
Make sure that our labour market is flexible
(1)
Particularly, seniority wage system
is not sustainable and has to be changed
(2)
For many workers, prime of career is
in the 40’s or early 50’s. Therefore, wages and benefits systems
will need to be adjusted so that it is still attractive to hire
older workers.
ii.
Employers have to restructure or redesign operations to
prepare themselves for more older workers
(1)
Reallocate responsibilities so that
older workers can do something less physically demanding, and
which they are good at. For example, older workers are more
reliable, more punctual, more patient, and friendlier. Companies
should make full use of this
iii.
We also need to change the negative mindsets against older
workers
(1)
Workers to continue to believe in
themselves, that they can learn and pick up new skills
(2)
Customers be more understanding, and
do not always expect everything to done in the quickest time
(3)
Employers to keep their doors open to
older workers – do not reject a job applicant just because he is
above 40
f.
The current situation will become increasingly untenable.
Older workers still have much to contribute. We need to get
companies to be more ready to employ older workers without
undermining their commercial viability
g.
A Tripartite Committee is currently studying these issues
in depth, and will submit its recommendations to the Government in
the coming months.
20.
Lower-skilled workers
a.
Face considerable difficulties. They cannot keep up with
the rapid changes, and risk being left behind as the economy
progresses.
b.
Continue to emphasise life long learning, training and
upgrading, to provide Singaporeans with new and relevant skills.
i.
Fit them into
industries which still require workers, e.g.
(1)
In services – healthcare, education, security,
public transport, childcare, retail and hotels
(2)
In manufacturing – shipbuilding, construction,
electronics and textiles.
ii.
But they must make an effort to adjust and not shun these
jobs, which will otherwise go to foreigners
iii.
Mindset is changing
(1)
Singaporeans used to shun jobs such
as healthcare assistants in hospitals. Now they queue up for the
jobs, and retention rate is high
(2)
Singaporeans used to shy about
becoming waiters. They asked ‘What if I have to serve a relative
or a friend that comes into the restaurant?’ But they are
gradually accepting the idea.
c.
At the same time, will ‘recreate’ some existing jobs to
make them more suitable and attractive for local workers
i.
In sectors such as
cleaning, construction, landscaping, electronics, precision
engineering and shipbuilding, factors such as low pay and
challenging working environment may have deterred Singaporeans
from taking up these jobs.
ii.
We can redesign these jobs, raise productivity, increase
pay, and make working conditions more pleasant
iii.
Targeting for 10,000 vulnerable workers to take up
meaningful employment over the next 12 to 18 months through the
Job Recreation Programme
d.
Mr Lim Swee Say is personally overseeing this
21.
PMETs (Professionals, Managers, Executives, Technicians)
a.
Because of outsourcing and company restructuring,
organisation structures are flattening
b.
Many middle level jobs which they used to do no longer
exists
c.
They are not qualified to get the new jobs that remain at
the top, and do not want to take up the jobs at the bottom
(sometimes the employers do not want over qualified workers
either)
d.
Have to find ways to help them
i.
Many of them have the
skills which companies can make use of, especially the SMEs who
need professional expertise. We can match them to these jobs.
ii.
Retrain them and fit them into new industries and
activities that can use their expertise – in healthcare as
technical operators and nurses, in schools as teacher and library
assistants, in the security industry as specialists and
supervisors, in the hospitality industries, or even financial
services.
iii.
Or have them start their own small businesses to provide
personalised services, such as tour guides, personal chefs,
butlers that help people get their lives organised
Conclusion
22.
We will do our utmost to help workers cope with
restructuring. But one solution we must avoid is welfarism
a.
Government welfare is not the answer to our problems. Many
countries have tried welfare
i.
Unemployment benefits
ii.
Grants and subsidies
iii.
Government as employer of last resort
b.
Ultimately, these do not work
i.
Experience in France, Germany, Scandinavia, UK, US
ii.
In the end someone i.e. the people themselves, has to pay
for benefits through higher taxes
iii.
Worse, in the long term welfarism will kill the drive to
work and achieve, chase away talent and investments, and do us
great harm
iv.
Burden ultimately goes back to the people, except now its
many times heavier
23.
We should not flinch from our approach, because we are on
the
right track
a.
Tackling problems squarely
b.
Adapting rather than resisting inevitable changes
c.
At the same time, will help people in a way that does not
discourage them to work
i.
For those who need extra help – ComCare Fund, pay as you
use electric meters,
ii.
For general public – ERS, U-Save Scheme, CPF and Medisave
top-ups
24.
Our approach is working
a.
Economy is growing
b.
We are equipping Singaporeans with relevant skills
i.
BERI has again rated Singaporean workers No 1 in the world
c.
We are creating opportunities for more jobs.
i.
Creating new jobs, re-creating old jobs
ii.
Nurturing new industry clusters, upgrading old clusters
iii.
Pursuing new service standards
25.
This is the Government’s responsibility. But workers too
must do your part.
a.
We will give you the best chance to be employed and to
improve their lives.
b.
But Singaporeans must adapt and seize the opportunities we
create.
26.
Our tripartite relationship is Uniquely Singapore – built
up over many years, not easy for others to copy, a tremendous plus
for us in dealing with this challenge. So let’s continue to
strengthen it, tackle our challenges together, and make Singapore
a small but special country for many more years.
Source:
Singapore Government Media Release 1 May 2005 |
|
|
|
|